| Posted by: max314 at May 1, 2008, 6:00 am | | Topic: The Official "SPEED RACER" Thread Forum: JoBlo | Quote: Originally Posted by Bourne101 Here's a new review: Sounds pretty meh to me. Sounds pretty fun to me It's a hollow-but-fun action adventure movie for kids and their families - which is exactly what I expect from a movie like this Quote: Originally Posted by Moviefan1234 This son of a bitch cost almost $200 million? The budget was $100 million, but because Speed Racer was going up against more well known properties like Iron Man, Narnia and Indiana Jones, the studio invested an additional $80 million into the marketing.
________
SPEED RACER is "THRILLING" and "TRIUMPHANTLY VISUAL", says EMPIRE Click here for the FULL REVIEW. It gets the same 3-star rating as Iron Man, and is supposed to be pure, dumb Summer fun. Which is perfect | | Static Link |
| Posted by: Preston_79 at April 29, 2008, 7:50 pm | | Topic: The Official "SPEED RACER" Thread Forum: JoBlo | | It may not be a waste of a studios cash, it just looks like one....to me. Trust me I wouldn't expect an Oscar performance and would take it for exactly what it is. It could be good family fun. Something tolerable for parents and wildly entertaining for giggly little kids. 200 million dollars! If that's really how much this movie cost....I'm.... talk about rolling the dice. | | Static Link |
| Posted by: ScaryFreak1827 at April 29, 2008, 7:18 pm | | Topic: The Official "SPEED RACER" Thread Forum: JoBlo | | Quote: Originally Posted by Preston_79 I can't find any reasons to get excited about Speed Racer. I'm digging, but it just looks way too stupid and I avoided watching the cartoon when I was younger because of the weak animation. Where's the substance to a Wachowski Brother's film? The MATRIX movie I loved, but that was years ago. They're talented film makers, but their name doesn't sell a movie to me. Visuals, visuals, visuals. Are the Wachowski Brother's going to blow my mind for an hour and a half with visuals? I seriously fucking doubt it. John Goodman spinning a dude over his head, a talking monkey. I'm just shaking my head in disbelief that someone could keep up enthusiasm making this film. These are my opinions. Other's obviously feel differently when I say things like, where's the substance. Sorry dudes, I just think Wachowski movies are as shallow as the kiddie pool, and Speed Racer has had years to get my attention in one form or another, but failed. It just doesn't add up in my mind. Cheers to what... | | Read Entire Entry |
| Posted by: Moviefan1234 at April 29, 2008, 6:58 pm | | Topic: The Official "SPEED RACER" Thread Forum: JoBlo | | Quote: Originally Posted by Bourne101 The scary thing is it's actually closer to $200 million. This son of a bitch cost almost $200 million? | | Static Link |
| Posted by: Bourne101 at April 29, 2008, 6:55 pm | | Topic: The Official "SPEED RACER" Thread Forum: JoBlo | | Quote: Originally Posted by Preston_79 Cheers to what looks like a 100 million dollars down the crapper. The scary thing is it's actually closer to $200 million. | | Static Link |
| Posted by: Preston_79 at April 29, 2008, 6:49 pm | | Topic: The Official "SPEED RACER" Thread Forum: JoBlo | | I can't find any reasons to get excited about Speed Racer. I'm digging, but it just looks way too stupid and I avoided watching the cartoon when I was younger because of the weak animation. Where's the substance to a Wachowski Brother's film? The MATRIX movie I loved, but that was years ago. They're talented film makers, but their name doesn't sell a movie to me. Visuals, visuals, visuals. Are the Wachowski Brother's going to blow my mind for an hour and a half with visuals? I seriously fucking doubt it. John Goodman spinning a dude over his head, a talking monkey. I'm just shaking my head in disbelief that someone could keep up enthusiasm making this film. These are my opinions. Other's obviously feel differently when I say things like, where's the substance. Sorry dudes, I just think Wachowski movies are as shallow as the kiddie pool, and Speed Racer has had years to get my attention in one form or another, but failed. It just doesn't add up in my mind. Cheers to what looks like a 100 million dollars down ... | | Read Entire Entry |
| Posted by: Bourne101 at April 29, 2008, 5:09 pm | | Topic: The Official "SPEED RACER" Thread Forum: JoBlo | | Here's a new review: Reviewed by "CPC Movies" Born to race cars, Speed Racer is aggressive, instinctive and, most of all, fearless. His only real competition is the memory of the brother he idolized - the legendary Rex Racer, whose death in a race has left behind a legacy that Speed is driven to fulfill. Speed is loyal to the family racing business, led by his father, Pops Racer, the designer of Speed's thundering Mach 5. When Speed turns down a lucrative and tempting offer from Royalton Industries, he not only infuriates the company's maniacal owner, but uncovers a terrible secret - some of the biggest races are being fixed by a handful of ruthless moguls, who manipulate the top drivers to boost profits. If Speed won't drive for Royalton, Royalton will see to it that the Mach 5 never crosses another finish line. The only way for Speed to save his family's business and the sport he loves is to beat Royalton at his own game. With the support of his family and his loyal girlfriend, Trixie, Speed team... | | Read Entire Entry |
| Posted by: max314 at April 29, 2008, 5:22 am | | Topic: The Official "SPEED RACER" Thread Forum: JoBlo | | Quote: Originally Posted by Bourne101 The race sequences are very exciting, but that's about all the script had to offer. Not too many touching moments. Anyway, we're only a week and a bit away, so I guess we'll just have to wait and see. Indeed. And sorry about the picture in the other thread...the temptation was too much to resist You gotta admit it was bloody funny - my mate saw it and fell over laughing | | Static Link |
| Posted by: Bourne101 at April 28, 2008, 6:52 pm | | Topic: The Official "SPEED RACER" Thread Forum: JoBlo | | The race sequences are very exciting, but that's about all the script had to offer. Not too many touching moments. Anyway, we're only a week and a bit away, so I guess we'll just have to wait and see. | | Static Link |
| Posted by: max314 at April 28, 2008, 6:25 pm | | Topic: The Official "SPEED RACER" Thread Forum: JoBlo | | Quote: Originally Posted by a7xfan im with bourne on this topic, i think speed racer looks like a pile of sweaty camel bollocks, they are selling it on its 'visuals' and what? its a dead cert to be brilliant because the wachowski's made it, ahem, matrix reloaded and revolutions not exactly epic brilliance. i too have read positive reviews, and max314, i think your taking odd pieces from diferent reviews to add to your argument. yes people have said that a couple of effects are off, and that some of the story is 'off' but they have also mentioned that this is understandable, due to the fact that its the first in the trilogy, and that it covers starks origins, which pan out very farfetched'. but thats understandable, i mean a man in a robotic suit, realistic huh?. and the fact that you think speed racer will be better or make more money at the box office is insane, totally. speed racer is nothing more that an annoying 'visual' movie, i can pretty much bet that the script and the acting will be fucking terrible... | | Read Entire Entry |
| Posted by: Bourne101 at April 28, 2008, 5:41 pm | | Topic: The Official "SPEED RACER" Thread Forum: JoBlo | | Quote: Originally Posted by a7xfan i can pretty much bet that the script and the acting will be fucking terrible. Well, I can't confirm the acting (although from the trailer it seems just awful, and I am a huge Emile Hirsch and John Goodman fan), but I've read the script top to bottom, all wopping 162 pages of it, and it is terrible. | | Static Link |
| Posted by: a7xfan at April 28, 2008, 5:35 pm | | Topic: The Official "SPEED RACER" Thread Forum: JoBlo | | im with bourne on this topic, i think speed racer looks like a pile of sweaty camel bollocks, they are selling it on its 'visuals' and what? its a dead cert to be brilliant because the wachowski's made it, ahem, matrix reloaded and revolutions not exactly epic brilliance. i too have read positive reviews, and max314, i think your taking odd pieces from diferent reviews to add to your argument. yes people have said that a couple of effects are off, and that some of the story is 'off' but they have also mentioned that this is understandable, due to the fact that its the first in the trilogy, and that it covers starks origins, which pan out very farfetched'. but thats understandable, i mean a man in a robotic suit, realistic huh?. and the fact that you think speed racer will be better or make more money at the box office is insane, totally. speed racer is nothing more that an annoying 'visual' movie, i can pretty much bet that the script and the acting will be fucking terrible. where as downey jr. has been prai... | | Read Entire Entry |
| Posted by: ScaryFreak1827 at April 28, 2008, 4:53 pm | | Topic: The Official "SPEED RACER" Thread Forum: JoBlo | | Here's a clip from the L.A. premiere of the movie. With interviews from: Matthews Fox, Susan Sarandon, John Goodman, Emile Hirsch and Christina Ricci. http://video.accesshollywood.com/pla...videoid=245185 | | Static Link |
| Posted by: Bourne101 at April 28, 2008, 2:21 pm | | Topic: The Official "SPEED RACER" Thread Forum: JoBlo | | Quote: Originally Posted by max314 I'm saying that I liked both movies, whereas you obviously hate the living shit out of just one. You talk like you've already seen these films, when you obviously haven't, and again, we don't need to assume that Empire is 100% right about Iron Man. Great reviews are rolling in from even better sources. Quote: Originally Posted by max314 Bullshit. I've clearly stated the positive aspects of the reviews (Downey, the performances). I've pointed out that the thing that matters most (i.e. the script) is poor. That's more balanced than you've been in a long time First of all, you don't KNOW the script is poor, you haven't read it so drop it. And also, it was obvious you were trying to point out the flaws, so you can drop that as well. Quote: Originally Posted by max314 You haven't even seen the final product, and yet you're jumping to such definite conclusions. I could say the same thing about you. Quote: Originally Posted by max314 You're not even giving it a chance. Such narrow... | | Read Entire Entry |
| Posted by: max314 at April 28, 2008, 4:52 am | | Topic: The Official "SPEED RACER" Thread Forum: JoBlo | | Quote: Originally Posted by Bourne101 Wow, that may be the lamest argument I've ever heard. You made an assertion. I made a counter assertion. It was on the same level as yours. Deja Vu seemed to like it Quote: Originally Posted by jolanar When I first heard about this movie I laughed at how bad it was going to be. But now that I've seen th trailer I think it looks pretty bad ass. I love the visuals. Looks like a fun time. Right. No matter what they're doing, the most foolish thing to do would be to write off the Wachowskis. I mean, they made The Matrix for fuck's sake. Anything they do will at least be worth a look in | | Static Link |
| Posted by: jolanar at April 27, 2008, 10:31 pm | | Topic: The Official "SPEED RACER" Thread Forum: JoBlo | | When I first heard about this movie I laughed at how bad it was going to be. But now that I've seen th trailer I think it looks pretty bad ass. I love the visuals. Looks like a fun time. | | Static Link |
| Posted by: Bourne101 at April 27, 2008, 9:42 pm | | Topic: The Official "SPEED RACER" Thread Forum: JoBlo | | Quote: Originally Posted by max314 A "treat", sure. Like sugar coated cornflakes. Or chocolate rice crispies. But Speed Racer will be a fucking banquet. Wow, that may be the lamest argument I've ever heard. Quote: Originally Posted by max314 You're obviously biased. A lot more than me, anyway. How exactly? I'm convinced that it will suck, you're convinced that it will be the greatest thing since sliced bread. There's no logic to your argument. Quote: Originally Posted by max314 I mean, I've expressed love for both films. By filling up the Iron Man thread with positive reviews and exploiting all of the negative comments? That's expressing love alright. Quote: Originally Posted by max314 You, on the other hand, are totally and unfairly bashing the living fuck out of Speed Racer. And for no apparent reason! I've given many reasons. Maybe search through the many pages of us going back and fourth. It's my opinion, if you can't deal with it then I don't know what to say. I'm obviously not the only one wh... | | Read Entire Entry |
| Posted by: Deju Vu at April 27, 2008, 9:07 pm | | Topic: The Official "SPEED RACER" Thread Forum: JoBlo | Quote: Originally Posted by max314
A "treat", sure. Like sugar coated cornflakes. Or chocolate rice crispies. But Speed Racer will be a fucking banquet. Epic comeback. I am with Max on this one, I think Speed Racer looks awesome! The visuals look amazing, and I have no problem with this "genetic plot" that you seem to hate so much Bourne. And no, I'm not biased, I said both Iron Man and Speed Racer, look fucking awesome, I'm just more excited about the possibilities that Speed Racer brings, rather then expected, but still kick ass possibilities of Iron Man. For me, that is what sets them apart. | | Static Link |
| Posted by: MovieBuff07 at April 27, 2008, 8:34 pm | | Topic: The Official "SPEED RACER" Thread Forum: JoBlo | | I'll admit I'm not a fan of Speed Racer or anything, but my favorite movie of all time is The Matrix, so I'm def. interested in this because of the Wachowski brothers. But whenever I see a trailer for this I automatically think "Damn, I can't wait to get that on blu ray." To me, the visuals are simply the definition of eye candy. | | Static Link |
| Posted by: Mr.HyDe807 at April 27, 2008, 7:59 pm | | Topic: The Official "SPEED RACER" Thread Forum: JoBlo | | Alright guys, lets calm down.....one isnt pump for the movie, one is. Lets just leave at that. Some people think its awesome with the visuals, some aren't. Its called a different in taste. Me? I'll wait for it when it comes on starz or something. Not MY cup of tea... | | Static Link |
| Posted by: max314 at April 27, 2008, 7:09 pm | | Topic: The Official "SPEED RACER" Thread Forum: JoBlo | | Quote: Originally Posted by Bourne101 I'd say Michael Phillips is a much more reliable source than the mainstream Empire. You say, I say... We could go on like this forever. All I know is that the most reliable mainstream film publication I know thinks the film is just average. Quote: Originally Posted by Bourne101 Biased? Because I think Speed Racer looks like a steaming pile of shit? I guess you're biased considering you think it's the greatest thing since sliced bread. You're obviously biased. A lot more than me, anyway. I mean, I've expressed love for both films. You, on the other hand, are totally and unfairly bashing the living fuck out of Speed Racer. And for no apparent reason! All existing reviews for Speed Racer have all ranged from "very favourable" to "outstanding - I can't wait to see it again!". And yet you refuse to even acknowledge that the film just might at least be "okay"! Yes, Bourne. I think you're massively biased. | | Static Link |
| Posted by: Bourne101 at April 27, 2008, 3:24 pm | | Topic: The Official "SPEED RACER" Thread Forum: JoBlo | | Quote: Originally Posted by max314 Which is tragic because, unlike biased Bourne, I'm expecting both films to be good fun. Biased? Because I think Speed Racer looks like a steaming pile of shit? I guess you're biased considering you think it's the greatest thing since sliced bread. | | Static Link |
| Posted by: Bourne101 at April 27, 2008, 3:16 pm | | Topic: The Official "SPEED RACER" Thread Forum: JoBlo | Quote: Originally Posted by max314 Empire is one of the best mainstream film magazines in the world. And it says that Iron Man is just "okay". I'd say Michael Phillips is a much more reliable source than the mainstream Empire. Quote: Originally Posted by max314 I was talking about Speed Racer, and how Alex Billington's gushing enthusiaism for the film is coming from a reliable source. There aren't any proper reviews yet due to non-disclosure agreements, but this is a very, very good sign. I realize what you were talking about, but Alex Billington isn't exactly what I would call a reliable source. Considering Iron Man has already had a fantastic review from arguably the most reliable source, I'd say we are in for a real treat. Quote: Originally Posted by max314 There you go putting words in my mouth again, Bourne. You really need to stop that retarded habit. I'm not putting words in your mouth at all. Quote: Originally Posted by max314 View Post
Well, I'm already 50% right. Iron Man was not the ... | | Read Entire Entry |
| Posted by: max314 at April 27, 2008, 1:21 pm | | Topic: The Official "SPEED RACER" Thread Forum: JoBlo | | Quote: Originally Posted by ScaryFreak1827 You can't judge the acting of a film until you actually SEE the film (and the trailers/clips don't count). Plus with the A-list actors who are starring in the film, I'd doubt the acting would be "terrible." Forgettable visuals? I've never seen a film with this type of look before which makes it something entirely DIFFERENT. It's the first film to look like this so in what way will the visuals be forgettable? This thread has ultimately become Iron Man vs. Speed Racer, two entirely different films being released within the same month. Both may end up kicking all kinds of ass but until they're released (and people actually see them) no one will know for sure. I'll probably see both but I'm expecting a more fun experience with Speed Racer due to its 'uniqueness.' Which is tragic because, unlike biased Bourne, I'm expecting both films to be good fun. I just think that Speed Racer will offer the better experience due to (a) the mindblowing preview material, and ... | | Read Entire Entry |
| Posted by: ScaryFreak1827 at April 27, 2008, 12:43 pm | | Topic: The Official "SPEED RACER" Thread Forum: JoBlo | | Quote: Originally Posted by Bourne101 Speed Racer will most likely blow large chunks of vomit. A stupidly generic plot, terrible acting, weak script, all thrown in with some visuals that will ultimately be forgettable. I'd put my money on Iron Man in terms of quality. You can't judge the acting of a film until you actually SEE the film (and the trailers/clips don't count). Plus with the A-list actors who are starring in the film, I'd doubt the acting would be "terrible." Forgettable visuals? I've never seen a film with this type of look before which makes it something entirely DIFFERENT. It's the first film to look like this so in what way will the visuals be forgettable? This thread has ultimately become Iron Man vs. Speed Racer, two entirely different films being released within the same month. Both may end up kicking all kinds of ass but until they're released (and people actually see them) no one will know for sure. I'll probably see both but I'm expecting a more fun experience with Speed Racer... | | Read Entire Entry |
| Posted by: max314 at April 27, 2008, 11:50 am | | Topic: The Official "SPEED RACER" Thread Forum: JoBlo | | Quote: Originally Posted by Bourne101 Michael Phillips is one of the best critics working today, and he absolutely loved Iron Man. Empire is one of the best mainstream film magazines in the world. And it says that Iron Man is just "okay". Quote: Really? Well, I'd say Michael Phillips is one of the most reliable critics working today, and he says Iron Man is stellar. I was talking about Speed Racer, and how Alex Billington's gushing enthusiaism for the film is coming from a reliable source. There aren't any proper reviews yet due to non-disclosure agreements, but this is a very, very good sign. Quote: 50% right? You must be fucking joking. You haven't seen Iron Man so you saying it's not good is just completely ignorant and stupid. If we're going to trust the reviews of reliable sources, then take a look at Michael Phillips' review. I'd say you're already 50% wrong. Speed Racer will most likely blow large chunks of vomit. A stupidly generic plot, terrible acting, weak script, all thrown in with so... | | Read Entire Entry |
| Posted by: Bourne101 at April 27, 2008, 10:22 am | | Topic: The Official "SPEED RACER" Thread Forum: JoBlo | | Quote: Originally Posted by Deju Vu You haven't seen Speed Racer, yet you hate on it constantly, since the moment that its trailer came out. Please listen to your own advice, except apply it to Speed Racer. Your being rather hypocritical saying that. On the Iron Man topic, I think it looks pretty sweet, and looking forward to it. I have higher hopes for Speed Racer but I think that Iron Man looks awesome as well, and hope it does great in the box office. I've never said that Speed Racer isn't good, I have just said that I think it won't be good, nothing wrong with that. | | Static Link |
| Posted by: Deju Vu at April 27, 2008, 10:20 am | | Topic: The Official "SPEED RACER" Thread Forum: JoBlo | | Quote: Originally Posted by Bourne101 You haven't seen Iron Man so you saying it's not good is just completely ignorant and stupid. You haven't seen Speed Racer, yet you hate on it constantly, since the moment that its trailer came out. Please listen to your own advice, except apply it to Speed Racer. Your being rather hypocritical saying that. On the Iron Man topic, I think it looks pretty sweet, and looking forward to it. I have higher hopes for Speed Racer but I think that Iron Man looks awesome as well, and hope it does great in the box office. | | Static Link |
| Posted by: Bourne101 at April 27, 2008, 9:32 am | | Topic: The Official "SPEED RACER" Thread Forum: JoBlo | | Quote: Originally Posted by max314 There are only 6 reviews up so far, and even the good reviews have got some pretty serious reservations about the film. And they all come to very similar conclusions: Downey is good, the script is not. And yeah, 3/5 ain't a bad score. But with the level of hype that some people have whipped themselves into, it's probably a bit disappointing. Personally, it's what I realistically expected. So I'm more than happy to have a fun time at the cinema Michael Phillips is one of the best critics working today, and he absolutely loved Iron Man. Quote: Originally Posted by max314 I call Alex Billington a "reliable source". Really? Well, I'd say Michael Phillips is one of the most reliable critics working today, and he says Iron Man is stellar. Quote: Originally Posted by max314 Well, I'm already 50% right. Iron Man was not the super-duper movie you thought it would be. In fact, it's distinctly average. An "okay" movie. Like Mission: Impossible 2 or The Phantom Mena... | | Read Entire Entry |
| Posted by: max314 at April 27, 2008, 8:34 am | | Topic: The Official "SPEED RACER" Thread Forum: JoBlo | | Quote: Originally Posted by bigred760 What's wrong with 3 out of 5 stars? I'm not expecting this to be the best movie I've ever seen . . . I'm expecting it to be a great time at the movies. 3 out of 5 isn't bad, not in the least. They're saying it's good. Plus, that's only ONE review. If you go over to rottentomatoes.com, while still early (I know), it's getting an 83%. Pretty good. There are only 6 reviews up so far, and even the good reviews have got some pretty serious reservations about the film. And they all come to very similar conclusions: Downey is good, the script is not. And yeah, 3/5 ain't a bad score. But with the level of hype that some people have whipped themselves into, it's probably a bit disappointing. Personally, it's what I realistically expected. So I'm more than happy to have a fun time at the cinema Quote: Originally Posted by Bourne101 You call a reliable source a source that posts reviews that they were specifically told not to post. These reviews mean nothing. I call Alex Billington... | | Read Entire Entry |
| Posted by: Bourne101 at April 26, 2008, 8:34 pm | | Topic: The Official "SPEED RACER" Thread Forum: JoBlo | | Quote: Originally Posted by max314 I'd consider Cinematical and FirstShowing.Net to be "reliable sources" with regards to their kick-ass Speed Racer reviews, thank you very much. You call a reliable source a source that posts reviews that they were specifically told not to post. These reviews mean nothing. Quote: Originally Posted by max314 Perhaps it's due to you deciding you're going to hate Speed Racer "just because"? Because it looks like a steaming pile of shit. Have I made myself clear enough? Quote: Originally Posted by max314 But in terms of quality, I reckon Speed Racer will leave most of its competitors at the starting line Dream on, my friend, dream on. | | Static Link |
| Posted by: bigred760 at April 26, 2008, 8:21 pm | | Topic: The Official "SPEED RACER" Thread Forum: JoBlo | | What's wrong with 3 out of 5 stars? I'm not expecting this to be the best movie I've ever seen . . . I'm expecting it to be a great time at the movies. 3 out of 5 isn't bad, not in the least. They're saying it's good. Plus, that's only ONE review. If you go over to rottentomatoes.com, while still early (I know), it's getting an 83%. Pretty good. | | Static Link |
| Posted by: max314 at April 26, 2008, 5:46 pm | | Topic: The Official "SPEED RACER" Thread Forum: JoBlo | | Quote: Originally Posted by Bourne101 Considering Iron Man is already getting fantastic reviews from RELIABLE sources, I would definitely expect Iron Man to be more of a critical and financial success than Speed Racer. Oh dear, it almost hurts to do this. Empire, which is arguably the world's most reputable mainstream film magazine, has rated the film at a disturbingly average 3 stars. That's 3 out of 5, before you ask. Not 3 out of 4. Just so you know, they gave three stars to films like M:I-2 and The Phantom Menace. They call Iron Man a "disappointment", saying that while there are some funny moments with Stark learning to make his suit, and some decent performances from some talented cast members, the film is not really that great. According to them, "it’s not sure where to go once the final Iron Man suit is constructed, and seems in a rush to get there". Quirky performances. Weak script. That verdict sounds awfully familiar... How's that for "reliable sources"? Oh, alm... | | Read Entire Entry |
| Posted by: max314 at April 26, 2008, 3:35 pm | | Topic: The Official "SPEED RACER" Thread Forum: JoBlo | | Quote: Originally Posted by Bourne101 Hahahhahahaha. Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha...what? Quote: I think you're missing the fact that is IS like many things we've seen before. The visuals are cheesy and cartoony, wow. Everything else is just basic. Perhaps you could point me to one film you've seen that looks anywhere near as insanely colourful and kinetic as Speed Racer. Quote: Considering Iron Man is already getting fantastic reviews from RELIABLE sources, I would definitely expect Iron Man to be more of a critical and financial success than Speed Racer. I'd consider Cinematical and FirstShowing.Net to be "reliable sources" with regards to their kick-ass Speed Racer reviews, thank you very much. I've actually heard more negative things about Iron Man (pacing problems, poor score, action scenes in trailers, story lite, etc) than I have about Speed Racer. I guess we'll just have to wait and see Quote: Never said they weren't generic. But you're using it as a criticism of Speed Race... | | Read Entire Entry |
| Posted by: Bourne101 at April 26, 2008, 2:23 pm | | Topic: The Official "SPEED RACER" Thread Forum: JoBlo | | Quote: Originally Posted by max314 I'm not "trashing sequels". I love the idea of serialised cinematic fiction. Hahahhahahaha. Quote: Originally Posted by max314 I'm just saying that Speed Racer isn't a sequel, isn't a Pixar movie, and isn't like anything else we've seen before. I think you're missing the fact that is IS like many things we've seen before. The visuals are cheesy and cartoony, wow. Everything else is just basic. Quote: Originally Posted by max314 And I don't think that Favreau's Iron Man will be better than the Wachowskis' Speed Racer. It's going to take more than a cute performance from Downey, a scary performance from Jeff Bridges, a series of gigglesome jokes, and a bunch of action fairly generic-looking set pieces that we've basically already seen to make a truly great movie. Considering Iron Man is already getting fantastic reviews from RELIABLE sources, I would definitely expect Iron Man to be more of a critical and financial success than Speed Racer. Quote: Originally Posted ... | | Read Entire Entry |
|