| Posted by: Arob at February 8, 2008, 9:03 am | | Topic: Is No Country For Old Men a horror movie? Forum: Movie List | | In my mind there is no doubt - I totally think the Coen Bros movie No Country for Old Men is most definitely a horror movie. Indeed, the book by Cormac McArthy was a horror novel... But the Coen brothers and Miramax have not advertised the movie as such... I believe they have indexed this film as 'Action / Thriller'. But its so much a HORROR MOVIE... A smart horror movie. Think about it. The movie has a villain, who is indeed very scary, and a mystery and plenty of creepy suspenseful moments.... Ah yes... but when was the last time a horror movie won Best Picture at the Academy Awards? | | Static Link |
| Posted by: spacemonkey at July 11, 2008, 4:20 pm | | Topic: Hellboy II: The Golden Army Forum: JoBlo | | Quote: Originally Posted by LordSimen That's the genre where Del Toro got his start, Spacemonkey. Yeah, I know thats where he started, but those arent really horror films. Cronos is more of a dark fantasy, then a straight forward horror film, so is The Devils Backbone. Mimic is a monster movie, but not really horror either. Im talking horror horror, not superhero horror either like Blade II. And those films and fine in their own right, Im not bashing them. In fact I own them cause I love them so much. Its just that I see stuff like that Angel of Death in Hellboy II and it makes me think damn, if he only put that much effort in a straightforward horror movie...jeez, we could really have something! | | Static Link |
| Posted by: someguy at August 20, 2008, 4:44 pm | | Topic: [REC] Forum: JoBlo | | Would I call [REC] a new horror classic? No. Would I consider it to be a really quick, intense and fun horror movie that is better than most horror films coming out today? Yes. I'd recommend getting it though, the US DVD doesn't come out until Quarantine comes out on DVD also and it actually is a pretty good horror film. Just don't believe the hype from people claiming BEST MOVIE EVER or SCARIEST THING I'VE SEEN. | | Static Link |
| Posted by: LordSimen at May 18, 2008, 9:34 pm | | Topic: Will Trick R Treat Ever See A Release? Forum: JoBlo | | I'm not a fan of watered down horror for the sake of watered down horror either, but to say that there is no such thing as PG-13 horror movie would be a lie. Poltergiest, 1408, The Sixth Sense, Gremlins, Jaws, hell even Stephen King's It has a TV-14 rating here in the U.S. I believe, and all are PG-13 (or lower) horror films. Whether or not you like them, that's up to you. But to deny the fact that they are horror would be wrong. | | Static Link |
| Posted by: Jax at February 8, 2008, 9:26 am | | Topic: Is No Country For Old Men a horror movie? Forum: Movie List | | Have you even seen this movie? I would not classify this as a horror movie (not at all) unless you some strange definition on what a horror movie is, to me horror is Hostel, Jeepers Creepers, Nightmare On Elm Street, Texas Chainsaw Massacre, Piranha, etc... and what does a "smart horror" mean. If you are familiar with the Coen brothers oevre you wouldn't dare calling this a horror movie. If it needs to be classiefied it would be better to call it a crime/drama. Btw the Coen brothers aren't strangers to the oscars, they've won before. | | Static Link |
| Posted by: RogerM at January 15, 2008, 1:50 pm | | Topic: Most brutal killing in any film Forum: groupsrv | | RichA wrote: Quote: Probably happened in a crime or history movie and NOT a horror movie. Horror movie killings tend to be quick, even if they are brutal. For instance, the pool cue beating-murder in the movie, "Deep Cover" exceeded in brutality any killing I can recall in a horror movie. Why am I not surprised this is one of Rich's threads? Anyway...there have been plenty of horror films with scenes of people being torn apart and eaten while still alive. -- | | Static Link |
| Posted by: MisterTwister at May 18, 2008, 9:50 pm | | Topic: Will Trick R Treat Ever See A Release? Forum: JoBlo | | Quote: Originally Posted by LordSimen I'm not a fan of watered down horror for the sake of watered down horror either, but to say that there is no such thing as PG-13 horror movie would be a lie. Poltergiest, 1408, The Sixth Sense, Gremlins, Jaws, hell even Stephen King's It has a TV-14 rating here in the U.S. I believe, and all are PG-13 (or lower) horror films. Whether or not you like them, that's up to you. But to deny the fact that they are horror would be wrong. Thank you | | Static Link |
| Posted by: Bourne101 at February 13, 2008, 3:52 pm | | Topic: The Signal Forum: JoBlo | | Quote: Originally Posted by Rawlin67 Wes Craven is probably the least reliable voice on how good a horror movie is. this could be good though, ill see any horror. Uh... how so? The man behind such greats as Red Eye, the Scream series, A Nightmare on Elm Street, The Last House on the Left, The Hills Have Eyes (remake, and original if you liked it). The creator of two of the greatest horror series of all time and what is considered the best horror film of the decade to some. So... how is he the least reliable voice on how good a horror movie is? Cause he made a few stinkers? Regardless, the man knows his horror. | | Static Link |
| Posted by: RichA at January 14, 2008, 1:35 pm | | Topic: Most brutal killing in any film Forum: groupsrv | | Probably happened in a crime or history movie and NOT a horror movie. Horror movie killings tend to be quick, even if they are brutal. For instance, the pool cue beating-murder in the movie, "Deep Cover" exceeded in brutality any killing I can recall in a horror movie. | | Static Link |
| Posted by: Lindsey at August 19, 2001, 8:17 pm | | Topic: Two views of Evil Dead Forum: JoBlo | | The Evil Dead is my favorite horror movie.Sam Rami is a very cool horror director.This movie is filled with everything you need for a horror movie.Gore,blood,humor,and Bruce Cambell! This movie is freaky and I did enjoy it both by myself and with my friends! | | Static Link |
| Posted by: Manco at January 15, 2008, 12:09 am | | Topic: Most brutal killing in any film Forum: groupsrv | | RichA wrote: Quote:Probably happened in a crime or history movie and NOT a horror movie. Horror movie killings tend to be quick, even if they are brutal. For instance, the pool cue beating-murder in the movie, "Deep Cover" exceeded in brutality any killing I can recall in a horror movie. Ummm the rack scene in Saw III? That has to be it. | | Static Link |
| Posted by: Flasherly at January 15, 2008, 8:37 am | | Topic: Most brutal killing in any film Forum: groupsrv | | On Jan 14, 6:35 pm, RichA wrote: Quote:Probably happened in a crime or history movie and NOT a horror movie. Horror movie killings tend to be quick, even if they are brutal. For instance, the pool cue beating-murder in the movie, "Deep Cover" exceeded in brutality any killing I can recall in a horror movie. Queen's Bench VII - LUris. | | Static Link |
| Posted by: MadsenOMC at April 10, 2008, 10:11 am | | Topic: The Ruins Forum: JoBlo | | Quote: Originally Posted by Shockwave Hey, if anything, be happy it wasnt another Hollywood remake of a japanese ghost movie. I think we can ALL be happy about that. And that's why I think people are being overly kind to the movie. Because think about what we are used to when it comes to mainstream horror. It's either a remake of Asian horror (The Eye, Shutter, One Missed Call) or a remake of '70s or '80s American horror (Prom Night) or straight-up torture porn. Either way, 90% of it is garbage. The best horror these days is mostly foreign, whether Asian or European. So yes, it is refreshing to see something that isn't a remake of some kind. However, I think that clouds assessments of the movie, at least a little bit. That or a love of the book elevates what one thinks of the movie. It's a pretty generic horror movie when all is said and done. I am all for something different, something that isn't a remake, but that alone doesn't make a movie good. | | Static Link |
| Posted by: blankpage at April 29, 2003, 5:06 pm | | Topic: The Shining Forum: JoBlo | | A good 'ol Kubrick/horror flick. IMO, this is a classic horror film that would please not only horror fans, but all around movie fans. It combines with some very scary moments, and excellent directing. And of course, a great performance by Jack Nicholson. As per said before, this is a horror film that should please all. I know I got my chills and thrills from this movie. A classic horror film. Or just a classic film on it's own. 9/10 | | Static Link |
| Posted by: Derek Janssen at January 14, 2008, 7:41 pm | | Topic: Most brutal killing in any film Forum: groupsrv | | RichA wrote: Quote:Probably happened in a crime or history movie and NOT a horror movie. Horror movie killings tend to be quick, even if they are brutal. For instance, the pool cue beating-murder in the movie, "Deep Cover" exceeded in brutality any killing I can recall in a horror movie. Thanks for sharing. Derek Janssen (what, were we supposed to, like, *answer*, or...?) ejanss1@verizon.net | | Static Link |
| Posted by: Russell Watson at January 15, 2008, 11:51 pm | | Topic: Most brutal killing in any film Forum: groupsrv | | On Tue, 15 Jan 2008 13:50:52 -0400, RogerM wrote: Quote:RichA wrote: Probably happened in a crime or history movie and NOT a horror movie. Horror movie killings tend to be quick, even if they are brutal. For instance, the pool cue beating-murder in the movie, "Deep Cover" exceeded in brutality any killing I can recall in a horror movie. Why am I not surprised this is one of Rich's threads? Anyway...there have been plenty of horror films with scenes of people being torn apart and eaten while still alive. More fantasy than horror, but remember the shock when the baby dragons ate the virgin sacrifice alive in "Dragonslayer"? "Oh my God, I thought this was fuckin' DISNEY movie! Get the kids outta here quick, and cover their eyes!" | | Static Link |
| Posted by: Scarface98.9 at May 15, 2008, 10:50 am | | Topic: P.T.A., please do horror! Forum: JoBlo | | The reason I think PTA shouldn't do a horror movie is because of what its become. I'll be the first to admit that horror was a legitamite genre and has had some classics like some of the ones listed. Many of which were made 30 years ago and stand the test of time but I can't name on one hand how many memorable horror movies have done that for me from the last 20 or so years. My job at Blockbuster means I see what's coming out each week and not a week goes by without some crappy straight to video schlock infecting shelf space. With so many new directors making horror movies, its given me the feeling of horror movies being less like entertainment and nothing more than mass produced fodder. While other genres like drama, comedy, etc. likely have just as much a bad to good ratio, i'm not bombarded with them, and I've seen a lot more variety in the types of movies of its genre. The horror movies I get to seeing usual has the same formula, the same shitty design for a villain or monster, the same tits and ass, and... | | Read Entire Entry |
| Posted by: Dragula at July 26, 2008, 7:46 pm | | Topic: THE STRANGERS October 21st Forum: JoBlo | | Quote: Originally Posted by Grn_Str_Movies this is an amazing movie that finally has proved that horror and suspense still exist and that its not only about the saw series. and by the looks of your collection you really dont know what horror is. i say give it another chance and youll see what im saying. 1. What the hell does the Saw franchise have to do with this? 2. So your judging my collection to see if I know what real horror is? So I have to own every single true horror film to know what horror is? Yeah, okay 3. I never said I wouldn't give it another chance, I would rent it at the Red Box one time. Listen grn, you really do have to let people have their own opinions. | | Static Link |
| Posted by: spacemonkey at April 17, 2008, 2:13 pm | | Topic: Help with topp 50/100 lists . . . Forum: JoBlo | | Well, you know, horror divides into various genres. Theres lots of bad horror. Lots of cheesy stuff, that some would consider great and others not. But it looks like your looking for the best of the best, like the top fifty films that you MUST watch if you want to watch the best in horror....I can start you off with one that will most likely be mentioned as #1 on almost every horror fans list. Texas Chainsaw Massacre (1979). This movie almost always precedes or is followed up by The Exorcist. | | Static Link |
| Posted by: IrishRover63 at January 20, 2008, 12:06 am | | Topic: Most brutal killing in any film Forum: groupsrv | | On Jan 14, 6:35 pm, RichA wrote: Quote:Probably happened in a crime or history movie and NOT a horror movie. Horror movie killings tend to be quick, even if they are brutal. For instance, the pool cue beating-murder in the movie, "Deep Cover" exceeded in brutality any killing I can recall in a horror movie. I agree that was pretty gross! What about this one? The movie isn't out yet though. It's filming here in Boston. Everyone hates it because it's too violent! I agree. YUCK. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k2CsGu5J92Q | | Static Link |
| Posted by: Sad man at June 22, 2003, 10:56 am | | Topic: (VIDEO) "The Texas Chainsaw Massacre" (10/10) Forum: JoBlo | | This is my second favourite horror movie. The first time I saw this it scared the shit out of me. The acting was great, and I was very surprised with Leatherface's first appearance. And the hook scene was just amazing. Everything was perfect, it scared me, it enterteined me. An excellent horror movie. I never give horror movies this high rating, but this movie really deserves it. THE TEXAS CHAINSAW MASSACRE Grade: or 10/10 or A+ | | Static Link |
| Posted by: night prowler at March 21, 2004, 5:21 pm | | Topic: Reviews: Dawn of the Dead Forum: JoBlo | | Now that is what I am talking about! I mean crappy horror movie after crappy horror movie (Wrong Turn, House of the Dead,....). Then comes this horror gem. These kinds of movies may demolish the teen movies. Acting: 9/10 Direction: 10/10 Music Score: 8/10 Script: 7/10 Effects: 10/10 Movie: 10/10 | | Static Link |
| Posted by: Sad man at April 4, 2004, 7:35 pm | | Topic: THE TEXAS CHAINSAW MASSACRE (Jessica Biel) Forum: JoBlo | | Quote: Originally Posted by ohsocrazy It is brutal, vile, dark, has no sense of mercy, hope, or laughter. That's called HORROR. Horror movies are supposed to be like that. And you really think it was that sick? I know it wasn't the easiest movie to watch but if you throwed up with this movie then I don't know what will be left of you if you see a movie like Cannibal Holocaust or Dead Alive. But I'm "glad" this movie made you sick, because it means that it's a really well done and effective horror movie. | | Static Link |
| Posted by: MadsenOMC at June 26, 2007, 12:19 pm | | Topic: Box Office numbers Forum: JoBlo | | Sure there has always been and always will be PG-13 horror, and R horror will never entirely disappear. But I think there is a lot of pressure on Halloween and Saw IV to do well (I don't think Captivity is going to be a hit, no matter how much After Dark hypes it). It's been a bad year for R horror and a great one for PG-13, and Hollywood only cares about what you've done for it lately. The longer R horror does poorly, the less we'll see theatrically. More and more will probably go the DTV route. | | Static Link |
| Posted by: Father Goose at April 27, 2007, 12:23 pm | | Topic: Hostel Review Forum: JoBlo | | Nail on the head for Diapason. Cabin Fever was a barely passable first effort, but it did show a love for the genre and some potential. Hostel is a big step forward, and I dug it. Look, do you think a horror god like Miike is going to do a cameo for a lightweight? Not happening. What horror fan can't appreciate a mutilated torture victim hiding on a cart full of bloody body parts? Like Diapason, I too have been a horror fan since I was a youngster in the 70's. Horror is a different animal. You have to draw the distinction between crossover horror that attempts to be successful in a traditional, mainstream movie sense (Exorcist, Rosemary's Baby, Omen, Jaws) and good old fashioned horror. On that level, Hostel works. Put another way, Hostel is not the kind of movie you would bring home to your mother. But you got to love it! | | Static Link |
| Posted by: spacemonkey at May 15, 2008, 2:18 pm | | Topic: P.T.A., please do horror! Forum: JoBlo | | Heres the thing though, horror is as shitty as it is right now because like you mentioned scarface98.9, theres too many crappy directors making horror films. Its come to the point where its just a watered down product. But the real root of the problem is mediocre directors with out any true vision out there. Non of these guys are focused on doing something different or truly frightening, they are most likely first time directors for hire, doing what they are being asked to do and getting payed for it as opposed to doing something you really love, doing something different, doing something that will really grab people, instead of doing the 100,000th Saw rip off. What horror needs are good directors who will actually put an effort into doing something thats worthwhile. Something that will truly knock our socks off. Thats what was so cool about the 70s, there were good directors making horror films. Like truly good directors. ANd hey, if Stanley Kubrick could do his horror movie, why cant any other great direct... | | Read Entire Entry |
| Posted by: Shockwave at April 7, 2008, 2:32 pm | | Topic: The Ruins Forum: JoBlo | | I enjoyed the RUINS, but i wouldnt say its one of the best horror in the last 10 years or anything. It was a effective horror movie that did its job, but not really anything thatll live on in my memory or anything. I thought Cloverfield, 28 Weeks Later(!!!), The Host, The Mist, 1408, The Descent, THE ORPHANAGE(..did no one see this?) were all better horror movies ive seen in the last year or so. | | Static Link |
| Posted by: greenmachine at August 16, 2008, 6:41 pm | | Topic: am i the only one that didn't like???.... Forum: JoBlo | | REC, without a doubt. Nearly everybody(especially horror fans) swears it's the best horror film in recent years. To me, it was typical headache-inducing bullshit like most current horror movies. With that considered, I'd go even further to say that the title is short for RECTUM, since the movie seriously eats ass, big time. | | Static Link |
| Posted by: blankpage at October 6, 2003, 6:33 pm | | Topic: Wes Craven's "The Hills Have Eyes" Forum: JoBlo | | When a horror film is done right, it kicks ass; When a horror film is done like this....it's fucking terrible. Being a fan of the genre, and hearing lots of good feedback, I had to check it out. Well, all I can say is what a bore. Story... 0; Scares... 0; Gore.... 4. If fact, it was fucking hilarious. It's not only bad movie making, but it's bad horror movie making. Ah well. In the end, one of the worst, if not, the worst film (and horror film) I have seen in my life. 0/10 | | Static Link |
| Posted by: Vicious at November 25, 2003, 10:19 pm | | Topic: Reviews: The Shining Forum: JoBlo | | classic horror movie the first time i saw it with the two little girls i was looking out my door all night! by far one of the best horror movies ever made and javk nicholsons performance is outstanding 8/10 in general 10/10 for horror movies | | Static Link |
| Posted by: Howard Brazee at April 18, 2008, 9:08 pm | | Topic: Oscars for acting in a horror movie? Forum: groupsrv | | On Fri, 18 Apr 2008 14:33:57 -0700 (PDT), moviePig wrote: Quote:I'm no authority, but on this point would argue only with those who claim to be. My personal supposition is that 'horror movie' has long borne the de facto gestalt of the supernatural ...made real, and come to scare you sh*tless. (Fwiw, I don't feel 'horror novel' carries the same stricture.) So, e.g., when I comment on HIGH TENSION, I address my remarks explicitly to 'horror fans' despite HT being *not* a 'horror movie' (...if I'm consistent, anyway). And thus, say, Freddy Kruger is horror but Michael Myers isn't. (We used to have a good word available for Michael, Jason, Norman Bates, and their serial- hijinks brethren... 'terror'... but it's lately been conscripted for a war effort...) To me, when it goes supernatural, it becomes less believable, and thus less horrifying. | | Static Link |
| Posted by: Jeffy3 at January 15, 2008, 11:03 am | | Topic: Most brutal killing in any film Forum: groupsrv | | On Jan 15, 1:37 pm, Flasherly wrote: Quote:On Jan 14, 6:35 pm, RichA wrote: Probably happened in a crime or history movie and NOT a horror movie. Horror movie killings tend to be quick, even if they are brutal. For instance, the pool cue beating-murder in the movie, "Deep Cover" exceeded in brutality any killing I can recall in a horror movie. Queen's Bench VII - LUris. The bound girl in the park getting stabbed in last year's ZODIAC was pretty harsh, as was the guy getting his head bashed in in the French IRREVERSIBLE. | | Static Link |
| Posted by: bigred760 at August 24, 2008, 4:09 pm | | Topic: Who's best ever film is Terminator 2: Judgement day? Forum: JoBlo | | Terminator is a horror movie? I'll give the sci-fi angle, but don't see the horror bit. It's more suspense than horror. T2 is a comedy? No wonder you didn't like it . . . you think it's a comedy. Try seeing it as a sci-fi action flick, and you might enjoy it more. | | Static Link |
| Posted by: Dr Walpurgis at August 20, 2004, 11:30 am | | Topic: why does zombie movies have to be about zombies taking over? Forum: groupsrv | | Henry wrote: Quote:Newsgroups: alt.horror, rec.arts.horror.movies, rec.arts.movies. current-films, rec.arts.movies.movie-going, rec.arts. movies.past-films Followup-To: alt.horror, rec.arts.horror.movies What? You're too good for this shit, and we aren't? Is that what you're saying? rec.arts.movies.* stroker. -- "Another clever one Dr Walpurgis. Again you have proven that you bring nothing to the table. I'm guessing you make a living in Academia, destroying the minds of youth." - Jizzy, alt.horror, 18/05/04 | | Static Link |
| Posted by: Anim8rFSK at April 18, 2008, 10:15 pm | | Topic: Oscars for acting in a horror movie? Forum: groupsrv | | In article wrote: Quote:I'm no authority, but on this point would argue only with those who claim to be. My personal supposition is that 'horror movie' has long borne the de facto gestalt of the supernatural ...made real, and come to scare you sh*tless. (Fwiw, I don't feel 'horror novel' carries the same stricture.) So, e.g., when I comment on HIGH TENSION, I address my remarks explicitly to 'horror fans' despite HT being *not* a 'horror movie' (...if I'm consistent, anyway). And thus, say, Freddy Kruger is horror but Michael Myers isn't. I don't understand the distinction. Michael Myers might or might not have been supernatural in the first film, but he certainly is in the sequels. Same notation for Jason. -- Star Trek 09: No Shat, No Show. http://www.disneysub.com/board/noshat.jpg | | Static Link |
| Posted by: psycho path at June 15, 2002, 10:13 pm | | Topic: Scooby Doo On Zombie Island 7/10 Forum: JoBlo | | Well I am not a diehard Scooby fan,I actually found this one to be more of a animated horror to me! Which is good cuz im a horror movie fan! Also,the voicer of Simone is of Adrienne Barbeau(SP?)well known to scary-movie buffs. The music score was good and actually gothic,the horror elements show quite well(At one point a zombies head is pulled off)and was entertaining! And no Scrappy. WOO-HOO!!! Anyway,i like this one,so i give it a 7/10! Great new voicers too! | | Static Link |
| Posted by: someguy at February 13, 2008, 9:55 pm | | Topic: The Signal Forum: JoBlo | | Quote: Originally Posted by Bourne101 Uh... how so? The man behind such greats as Red Eye, the Scream series, A Nightmare on Elm Street, The Last House on the Left, The Hills Have Eyes (remake, and original if you liked it). The creator of two of the greatest horror series of all time and what is considered the best horror film of the decade to some. So... how is he the least reliable voice on how good a horror movie is? Cause he made a few stinkers? Regardless, the man knows his horror. because its the equivalent of larry king with more cred in terms of 'critic' comments | | Static Link |
| Posted by: Paul B. Thompson at April 18, 2008, 11:44 am | | Topic: Oscars for acting in a horror movie? Forum: groupsrv | | "Howard Brazee" wrote: Dr. J is horror because it hinges on a supernatural/science fictional premise. "Lambs" is simply about crime and detection. But both have horror. Was Hannibal Lector realistic? There have been any number of cannibalistic serial killers in history, so the short answer is yes, Lector is realistic. I make a distinction between "horror," a reaction of revulsion, and "horror movie," which has a traditional scope and subject matter. PBT | | Static Link |
| Posted by: Diapason at April 26, 2007, 11:01 pm | | Topic: Hostel Review Forum: JoBlo | | I’ve been watching these flicks since the days of The Birds, Psycho original TCM etc., and I can say objectively that this movie was fairly effective. I don’t see why some reviews are so negative. I mean, really…IT’S A HORROR FLICK!!! What were you expecting…AMADEUS - SCHINDLER'S LIST? Yeah, it didn’t have the acting brilliance or the top notch directing as in JAWS or THE EXORCIST, but hey, it was a decent horror flick as far as I’m concerned, and I enjoyed it. I wouldn’t put it in the top 10 or anything, but it wasn’t horrible. As far as the stoner T&A stuff, again IT’S A HORROR FLICK. Other than that rare collection of classics, 99.9% of ALL horror movies are filled with mindless sex and drugs, or have you forgotten. That’s why we like horror movies…it’s garbage….but it’s so much fun. As far as Cabin Fever, I don’t know what kind of heavy drugs some people are on, but are you kidding me? That movie was ridiculous. It was really bad. Relatively speaking, Hostel is a far better movie in every respect. I ... | | Read Entire Entry |
| Posted by: Hannibal21 at September 22, 2003, 5:24 pm | | Topic: MAY (Angela Bettis & Anna Faris) Forum: JoBlo | | Freddy vs. Jason is winning? NO WAY! You know, the more I think about it, the more I feel cheated. I gave it a 6/10 right away after seeing it just because it was a fun horror film, nothing else. But the acting was even worse than atrocious, and there weren't one single hint of any eerieness to it, it wasn't treated as a horror film at all. Freddy and Jason were also wasted, not to mention they weren't scary anymore. Back in the ANOES and FRIDAY THE 13TH movies at least they were convincing villains and there were hints that those films were horror films, bad horror films maybe, but horror films nontheless. But this one wasn't even a 'horror' film, so I'm lowering my grade.........5/10 feels right, maybe 4/10. Btw, MAY deserves to win. That and Identity are by far the best horror films of the year IMO. | | Static Link |
|