Movie Talks Archives

Posted by: fooknasty at July 14, 2008, 2:15 pm
Topic: Cloverfield Forum: JoBlo
Quote: Originally Posted by MarcoPolo Parasites would make more sense...did they say that at some point in the movie? A more "realistic" monster (in terms of fiction) would be one that was given some semblance of origin or some system of rules in which the monster operates. Like how in the X-Files, they always tried to offer something within the extreme realms of plausibility for their monsters. Again, I would only feel a movie needs to do this if it tries to be plausible and I didn't think this movie had harmony in that regard, it tried to mix plausible with implausible. I really liked the idea that there was no explanation towards the monster. However, I would like to get some kind of origin explanation in a possible sequel.

Similar entries:

2008 Movies that Disappointed
CLOVERFIELD (no spoilers)
Cloverfield
Cloverfield
What was the Cloverfield monster? What do you think?
Cloverfield (1-18-08 J.J.Abrams project)
Cloverfield
1.18.08 // Cloverfield // J. J. Abrams Project
Cloverfield
Box Office Predictions Thread

Shared Movies
Over 80 Million Movies and TV-Shows to choose from

Categories:

Thriller Movie  Divx Movie  Movie News  Harry Potter  Comedy Movie  Best Movies  Censorship  Movie Review  Fantasy Movie  TV Series  History Movie  Movie Trailer  Movie Quote  DVD Releases  Celebrities  Drama Movie  Science Fiction Movie  Great Movie  Spoiler  Worst Movies  

Links:

Forum Extractor







Shared Movies
Over 80 Million Movies and TV-Shows to choose from
Play movies on your computer, Home theater or TV
No Charge per movie, No download limit what so ever!



CLOSE