| videonovels@yahoo.com wrote: Quote:... Kate wrote: Going back to the LCD resolution question, it's my understanding that with an interlaced display, your eye is only seeing half the lines at one time anyway, so there is no actual loss of resolution when using the shutter glasses. I'm not a techie, so if someone has other information, please share it. Uh. (thinks) Without 3D you would see the Even lines, then the Odd lines, and they would merge into a single frame (mentally). So you see the full 480 lines resolution. In contrast, with 3D, you first see the Even/left image at 240 lines. Then you see the Odd/right image at 240 lines. The two images do NOT merge, because they are separate viewpoints from two separate cameras. ------ So you're only seeing 240 lines from each camera. Half the resolution. ... I don't know how it all shakes out subjectively (...and I'm not sure that anyone does, definitively). But, even though each eye sees a mere 240 lines, there is clearly more than 240 lines worth of information getting through (...unless each of those two 240-line sets is identical, which it never is). -- /---------------------------\ | YOUR taste at work... | | | | http://www.moviepig.com | \---------------------------/ |