| On Feb 26, 1:27 am, moviePig wrote: Quote: ...unless the cute puppy is an 8-month-old 100-lb. Rottweiler going for your jugular. The question here isn't whether Polanski used bad or unacceptable judgment, but whether his actions were *necessarily* sick, twisted, perverted, etc... Not sure I understand the difference between "necessarily" and "actually" here. Quote:...In that regard, btw, the argument against Michael Jackson seems considerably stronger, for obvious reasons... Not sure I understand those either. In as much as there appeared to be a pattern, sure, but I don't remember any of Jackson's news reports having the word "sodomised" in them. Happily in my black-and-white world I can view them both as scumbags, and don't have to worry about who's the darker grey. Quote:(none of them homosexuality). I never doubted you. |