| Posted by: RichA at February 27, 2008, 5:24 am | | Topic: "300" was robbed Forum: groupsrv | | On Feb 27, 1:11 am, Effet de Papillon wrote: Quote:On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 07:21:51 -0800 (PST), RichA <rander3...@gmail.com wrote: On Feb 26, 8:37 am, Effet de Papillon <newsgroupss...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 15:04:07 -0800 (PST), RichA <rander3...@gmail.com wrote: It should have won something for cinematography or FX. The LIBERAL Academy members HATED its right wing agenda. "right wing agenda"? You're kidding, right? Since when does the right wing agenda include supporting homosexuality? Debbie Only kooks saw that in the movie, or people who were more preoccupied with the men's physiques instead of the battles. Only homophobes blindly ignore the blatant homosexual subtext of that film. (Not that there's anything wrong with that, it's just that the film was promoted in a disingenuous way, IMO.) It's almost as ridiculous as a guy saying he only reads Playboy for the articles. Debbie So what specifically where the subtexts that lead you to the conclusion? |
| |
Similar entries:
Black Snake Moan
Black Snake Moan
Oscar / film quality
There Will Be Blood
The Scorcese Dilemma
"300" was robbed
why does zombie movies have to be about zombies taking over?
"300" was robbed
Films Robbed Of An Oscar
Juno
|
|
Shared Movies
Over 80 Million Movies and TV-Shows to choose from
Categories:
Fantasy Movie Celebrities Star Wars Movie Review Action Movie Divx Movie Spoiler Best Movies Great Movie Censorship Movie Award Lord of the Ring Science Fiction Movie TV Series History Movie Comedy Movie Romance Movie News Adventure Movie Blooper
Links:
Forum Extractor
|