| Posted by: Chris at June 21, 2004, 8:01 pm | | Topic: UK's GCHQ Whistle-blower case also impacts Greenpeace protes Forum: groupsrv | | "BTR1701" wrote: "BTR1701" wrote: "BTR1701" <BTR1702@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message news:BTR1702-E2E46C.23414720062004@news.west.earthlink.net... In article <40d626ab$0$17089$811e409b@news.mylinuxisp.com>, wbarwell@munnnged.mylinuxisp wrote: If supporters of a particular government party gather together to prevent people from seeing a film by threatening movie theaters, its indimidation and censorship. You just described what the left has been doing for 20 years. And according to the Constitution it's not a violation of anyone's rights. Only censorship by the government violates the 1st Amendment. Merely being the "supporter of a government party" (whatever that means) doesn't qualify. If you think it does, feel free to post a legal citation to support your position. Sec.22 paragraph 14 sub section A states: YOU ARE AN ASSHOLE So basically you have no legal proof to back up your position and you resort to calling people names who disagree with you. If you're not a 10-year-old, you sure are doing a great impression of one. Sorry I guess some of Sean Hannity rubbed off Is that supposed to make some kind of sense? Who is Sean Hannity? What kind of right wing nut does not know that |
|
Shared Movies
Over 80 Million Movies and TV-Shows to choose from
Categories:
Star Wars Anime Comedy Movie DVD Releases TV Series Movie Rating Movie Trailer Romance Tragedy Movie Celebrities Horror Movie Favourite Movie Spoiler Worst Movies Movie Review Lord of the Ring Movie Download Movie Theater Fantasy Movie Adventure Movie
Links:
Forum Extractor
|