| Posted by: BTR1701 at June 21, 2004, 7:48 pm | | Topic: UK's GCHQ Whistle-blower case also impacts Greenpeace protes Forum: groupsrv | | In article wrote: Quote:"BTR1701" wrote: "BTR1701" <BTR1702@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message news:BTR1702-E2E46C.23414720062004@news.west.earthlink.net... In article <40d626ab$0$17089$811e409b@news.mylinuxisp.com>, wbarwell@munnnged.mylinuxisp wrote: If supporters of a particular government party gather together to prevent people from seeing a film by threatening movie theaters, its indimidation and censorship. You just described what the left has been doing for 20 years. And according to the Constitution it's not a violation of anyone's rights. Only censorship by the government violates the 1st Amendment. Merely being the "supporter of a government party" (whatever that means) doesn't qualify. If you think it does, feel free to post a legal citation to support your position. Sec.22 paragraph 14 sub section A states: YOU ARE AN ASSHOLE So basically you have no legal proof to back up your position and you resort to calling people names who disagree with you. If you're not a 10-year-old, you sure are doing a great impression of one. Sorry I guess some of Sean Hannity rubbed off Is that supposed to make some kind of sense? Who is Sean Hannity? |
|
Shared Movies
Over 80 Million Movies and TV-Shows to choose from
Categories:
Film Festival Movie Review Blooper Tragedy Movie Romance Fantasy Movie DVD Releases Movie Award Movie Theater Divx Movie Action Movie Film noir History Movie Movie Rating Horror Movie Lord of the Ring Star Wars Best Movies Thriller Movie Movie Download
Links:
Forum Extractor
|